Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
05-24-2005, 03:33 AM | #1 |
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
New 2257 regs published (link here)
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...5/05-10107.htm
Since European Lee had to spam his board with his post I found the direct link to the new regs for you.
__________________
sig too big |
05-24-2005, 03:45 AM | #2 |
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Damn....it's 16 pages worth of very small print.
I'm gonna be reading for awhile
__________________
sig too big |
05-24-2005, 03:48 AM | #3 |
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Here's a link to the PDF file....much easier to print
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...f/05-10107.pdf
__________________
sig too big |
05-24-2005, 03:50 AM | #4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,761
|
from what I could see...
google cache (and the like) is now exempt. |
05-24-2005, 03:51 AM | #5 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 12,240
|
__________________
I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded. |
05-24-2005, 04:03 AM | #6 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: el lay, ca usa
Posts: 2,540
|
long, but interesting. the comment i sent was listed - weird!
|
05-24-2005, 04:08 AM | #7 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central florida
Posts: 202
|
__________________
----------- ICQ#147-366-451 |
05-24-2005, 04:18 AM | #8 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
..... |
|
05-24-2005, 04:27 AM | #9 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 04:29 AM | #10 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ICQ: 303-282-636
Posts: 4,786
|
Can someone who is going to read the whole thing, summarize the what you can and can't do's? I doubt i'm the only one who doesn't have time to read it.
|
05-24-2005, 04:30 AM | #11 | |
♥♥♥ Likes Hugs ♥♥♥
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: /home
Posts: 15,841
|
Quote:
__________________
I like pie. |
|
05-24-2005, 04:30 AM | #12 |
i have man boobies
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: van down by the river
Posts: 13,082
|
lenny, we need to chat
icq# 333-765-551
__________________
333-765-551 |
05-24-2005, 04:31 AM | #13 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sunny Queensland - perfect one day and better the next.
Posts: 2,106
|
If you don't have time to read something as important as this then you shouldn't be here doing business.
__________________
Left intentionally blank ... just like my brain |
05-24-2005, 04:33 AM | #14 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Alright, here's the important parts:
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 04:33 AM | #15 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ICQ: 303-282-636
Posts: 4,786
|
Quote:
Edit: Thanks swedguy |
|
05-24-2005, 04:34 AM | #16 |
They're all hookers, but mom!
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Right now Shelby Twp MI
Posts: 7,047
|
see post please
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=471428
__________________
RAM Fucking Machines are like CASH MACHINES See RAM on these quality sites!! Rightofftheboat.com EuroBrideTryouts.com |
05-24-2005, 04:36 AM | #17 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Fuck this is going to be a HUGE pain in the ass if you crank out a shit load of sites a day.
For any performer portrayed in such a depiction after June 23, 2005, the records shall include (ii) Where the depiction is published on an Internet computer site or service, a copy of any URL associated with the depiction |
05-24-2005, 04:39 AM | #18 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ICQ: 303-282-636
Posts: 4,786
|
What i'm interested is in how will this affect Thumb TGP's and other similar sites.
|
05-24-2005, 04:41 AM | #19 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 04:45 AM | #20 | |
Now with more Jayne
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40,077
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 04:49 AM | #21 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Ok this seems to be good news for everyone and especially sponsors:
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 04:49 AM | #22 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 7,133
|
Quote:
Regards, Lee |
|
05-24-2005, 04:53 AM | #23 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
|
Quote:
Um, doesn't look like good news to me. It says ANY PRODUCER required to maintain records which includes secondary producers. Unless I read something wrong which could be the case this time of day. |
|
05-24-2005, 04:53 AM | #24 |
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
bullshit, every word of it, meant the curb the proliferation of all pornography on the internet period...it has no other purpose
|
05-24-2005, 04:54 AM | #25 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
Let the injunctions begin!!!!!
|
05-24-2005, 04:57 AM | #26 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:00 AM | #27 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:01 AM | #28 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:03 AM | #29 | |
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
Quote:
Do you think these law students who daddy got into public office would leave loopholes for pornographers? Dude they sat up for 6 months in their aspen compound, sipping scotch, skiing & thinking of ways to fuck you over. |
|
05-24-2005, 05:05 AM | #30 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Now this is real fun! We're all going to become desk jockeys
Fuck it, I'm not going to quote the whole thing. Read § 75.2(a)(2) and § 75.3 I think I'm going to buy a shit load of content before June 23 |
05-24-2005, 05:06 AM | #31 |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Check http://www.fuck2257.com in the coming weeks as we have many exciting programs coming down the pipe geared towards affiliates (especially those cranking out lots of free sites and galleries.)
(and yes I know it's not resolving at the moment) |
05-24-2005, 05:07 AM | #32 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:07 AM | #33 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,761
|
"[The] FSC intends to test the validity of the new rules by filing multiple lawsuits, asking for a temporary restraining order and an injunction. By taking swift proactive steps, FSC hopes to protect its members from prosecution, while challenging the law as unconstitutional."
http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/application.php |
05-24-2005, 05:08 AM | #34 |
rockin tha trailerpark
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ~Coastal~
Posts: 23,088
|
I just changed my sig.....anyone interested, feel free to hit me up tomorrow
__________________
__________ Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz) |
05-24-2005, 05:11 AM | #35 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
But they phrased it a little vague: "URL associated with the depiction" Is it the URL to the root of the domain? Is it the URL to the entrance page? Is it the URL to the picture? |
|
05-24-2005, 05:16 AM | #36 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
Section 75.7...
I have some content... say 30 pics.. 20 of them aren't covered by the requirements because there's nothing sexually explicit about them.. 10 are.. So is the producer supplying me with all the info required for the record keeping just in case I use the 10 images, as well as a statement that pics 1-20 aren't covered by the requirements? I have plenty of sets already that are like that where I don't even use the explicit content. But I don't have any statements from any producer that says images x-y aren't covered by the record keeping requirements. Edit: yeah.. grandfather clause and all that.. |
05-24-2005, 05:16 AM | #37 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marina Hemingway
Posts: 2,130
|
So secondary US producers like tgp webmasters need to keep complete records as well. Interesting!! Poor Americans!
(b) A producer who is a secondary producer as defined in Sec. 75.1(c) may satisfy the requirements of this part to create and maintain records by accepting from the primary producer, as defined in Sec. 75.1(c), copies of the records described in paragraph (a) of this section. Such a secondary producer shall also keep records of the name and address of the primary producer from whom he received copies of the records. |
05-24-2005, 05:18 AM | #38 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,981
|
Quote:
You are right. I think that's what it says in § 75.2(a)(2). section (d) |
|
05-24-2005, 05:19 AM | #39 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
It is up to you as a secondary producer to keep the URL records for the individual explicit photos and cross-reference that with the records you received from your content provider. |
|
05-24-2005, 05:20 AM | #40 | |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: West Coast, Canada.
Posts: 10,217
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:22 AM | #41 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:22 AM | #42 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ICQ: 303-282-636
Posts: 4,786
|
All i can say is this is really fucked up, i hope the FSC can come up with something.
|
05-24-2005, 05:23 AM | #43 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marina Hemingway
Posts: 2,130
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:27 AM | #44 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
fuck2257.com launches in the next 48 hours |
|
05-24-2005, 05:29 AM | #45 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 6,924
|
Quote:
|
|
05-24-2005, 05:38 AM | #46 | |
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, CANADA
Posts: 263
|
Quote:
We will post the information as soon as we have it. |
|
05-24-2005, 05:41 AM | #47 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Tube Titans, USA
Posts: 11,929
|
Every industry is regulated. Take a look at the massive regulations which govern the securities markets with jail time and large fines for those that do not comply.
Roll up your sleeves and get to work.
__________________
skype = "adultdatelink" |
05-24-2005, 05:46 AM | #48 | |
Now with more Jayne
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40,077
|
I found this bit interesting:
Quote:
anyway..interesting to see they addressed something I wrote and said one person said it..find that hard to believe. |
|
05-24-2005, 05:51 AM | #50 |
I'm Lenny2 Bitch
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: On top of my soapbox
Posts: 13,449
|
Some of the questions and comments in here are ridiculous.......did you think the justice department was going to write a brief on thumb tgp's versus text tgp's?
Most of this stuff hasn't changed since the proposed regs came out 11 months ago.....if you're not familiar with them, then crawl back under your rock. A couple of things I did find interesting in their response to the comments One is that they keep saying that the D.C. court in American Library Ass'n V. Reno "implicitly accepted" the distinction between primary producers and secondary producers, and that the requirement that secondary producers maintain records was not a constitutionally impermissable burden. So they're basically dismissing Sundance V. Reno and saying that in their view the D.C. court's ruling in the other case is the "correct view of the law" Now I googled the hell out of American Library Ass'n V. Reno and all I found was the case about internet filtering software in libraries......I have no idea what this has to do with record keeping. Anyways...moving on From the response to comments "Any primary producer who fails to release the records to a secondary producer is simply in violation of the regulations and may not use the excuse that the records contain alleged trade secrets to avoid compliance" That will get interesting. And here's my favorite....in response to comments that primary producers should be allowed to "sanitize" identification documents by removing home addresses etc before passing the documents on to secondary producers, the Department declines to adopt this comment because it would be "overly burdensome" on primary producers. "Primary producers would be required to first sanitize the identification documents and then draft, sign, and pay for a notarized affidavit. It is simpler and less burdensome to have primary producers transfer a copy of the records to secondary producers" I'm laughing my ass of at this one......primary producers would LOVE to be able to sanitize the documents and get notarized affidavits to send to their customers.
__________________
sig too big |