Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2007, 03:37 PM   #1
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,381
:stop GOVERNMENT OF CANADA (!) message regarding .XXX

see message here

http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg00558.html


basically they are anti-.xxx since it would require ICANN to play a more direct role in monitoring content and they say ICANN should just concentrate on the technical side of the Web

__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.

Last edited by polish_aristocrat; 02-02-2007 at 03:38 PM..
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 03:44 PM   #2
starpimps
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: internets
Posts: 6,954
the Canadian government isafraid that the .xxx will make people move out of our igloos and stop playing hockey
__________________
Teen Porn Models / Solo Girls
starpimps is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 03:47 PM   #3
StuartD
Sofa King Band
 
StuartD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Outside the box
Posts: 29,903
It's true... they're not the police, and they certainly can't tell everyone in every country what they can and can't do.

Err... shouldn't be able to.
StuartD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 03:47 PM   #4
BlackCrayon
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
BlackCrayon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 19,624
does anyone want this that doesn't stand to gain financially from it?
__________________
you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..
BlackCrayon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 03:52 PM   #5
starpimps
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: internets
Posts: 6,954
i dont want the .xxx but i dont think the canadian government's opinion really matter a whole lot
__________________
Teen Porn Models / Solo Girls
starpimps is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:03 PM   #6
germ
( o Y o )
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,108
yeah i dont really see what the canadian government has to do with anything in regards to this issue.

nice of them to comment though.
germ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:07 PM   #7
jact
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 9,134
That makes me happy.
__________________
Free agent
jact is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:11 PM   #8
_Richard_
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
_Richard_'s Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 30,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by germ View Post
yeah i dont really see what the canadian government has to do with anything in regards to this issue.

nice of them to comment though.
just the desperate voice of reason. again.

R
__________________
skype: stxrichard | [email protected]
_Richard_ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:13 PM   #9
bogo
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,982
Fuckin Eh
bogo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:16 PM   #10
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
Just shows the Canadian Gov has porn sites!
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:22 PM   #11
davecummings
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,922
:-)))

Dave
www.davecummings.com
davecummings is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:32 PM   #12
davecummings
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,922
Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat View Post
see message here

http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg00558.html


basically they are anti-.xxx since it would require ICANN to play a more direct role in monitoring content and they say ICANN should just concentrate on the technical side of the Web

Thanks for alerting us to this--we appreciate you monitoring the ICANN Forum/Comments and giving us the word:-)).

Dave
davecummings is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:35 PM   #13
free4porn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,655
good to have their backing though
__________________
Switch To Fling Now! I'm on 1:201 paid signups sending little traffic! Make $$$
Free Porn
free4porn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 04:36 PM   #14
Martin
"Assassins"
 
Martin's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: At home
Posts: 17,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Sexbankroll View Post
just the desperate voice of reason. again.

R
Indeed.
Martin is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 05:01 PM   #15
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
More and more I like Canada ,a move and change in citizenship maybe on the horizon.
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 05:46 PM   #16
DamageX
Marketing & Strategy
 
DamageX's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Former nomad
Posts: 14,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjorn View Post
Is this the real Dave Cummings ? im a fan lol
It's the real Dave Cummings.
__________________
Whitehat is for chumps

If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!
DamageX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 05:59 PM   #17
Mark_E4A
Confirmed User
 
Mark_E4A's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: pornSEO.com - Toronto
Posts: 1,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by germ View Post
yeah i dont really see what the canadian government has to do with anything in regards to this issue.

nice of them to comment though.
Well, this not fact, but, IMO our government LOVES our porn, we bring in money from other contries and pay tax. They love the tax money.

Why fuck with something that is paying for their holidays
__________________
icq - 205700725
email - marke4a at gmail com
phone - 416-809-4393
Mark_E4A is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 06:15 PM   #18
SleazyDream
I'm here for SPORT
 
SleazyDream's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696
Posts: 41,470
canada good
__________________
This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

Now read without the word dog.
SleazyDream is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 07:11 PM   #19
Dcat
Confirmed User
 
Dcat's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 1,607
Finally it feels like the Canadian government is on my side. Albeit for alterior motives.

If they want to use a few of my tax dollars to oppose the fleecing of adult webmasters by Stuart Lawley and his band of gready fucks at ICM Registry, so be it.

Fuck .xxx!!
Dcat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2007, 08:08 PM   #20
davecummings
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,922
Insurance Against ICANN et al Overlooking THis!

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave C.
To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 7:01 PM
Subject: Canada's Government is Also Against .xxx, per http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm-agreement/




COMMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA



The Government of Canada thanks ICANN for providing an opportunity to comment on the revised proposed agreement with ICM providing for designation of a .XXX sTLD registry. Canada continues to participate in the ICANN Government Advisory Committee?s discussion of the creation of this new sTLD. However, Canada is concerned with the direction the ICANN process appears to be taking and the possible implication of that direction for the future of the organization and of the Internet itself. The following comments are intended to draw our concerns to the attention of the broader Internet community.



In 2006, in our response to the United States Department of Commerce Notice of Inquiry (NOI), Canada made the following point: ?? it is essential to underscore and to reiterate the narrow technical nature of ICANN?s mandate, as a body responsible for the administration of Internet names and Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. We recognize that these technical issues occasionally give rise to policy considerations. This has led to confusion about ICANN's role and sometimes distracted the organization from its core mandate. Canada is of the view that, going forward, ICANN and its stakeholders should be scrupulous in taking a very narrow view of ICANN's policy functions, ensuring that any policy issues considered arise directly from and/or are inextricably linked to the organization?s core technical functions. Any other policy issues should be referred to other more appropriate bodies.? Our response went on to say: ?In considering the policy-making aspect of ICANN?s role, it is of fundamental importance to make a distinction between broad Internet-related public policy issues such as spam, fraud, child pornography, etc., which are clearly outside ICANN?s mandate, and the more focused policy issues directly related to the technical functioning of the Internet, which are within its mandate.?



We have reviewed the content of the revised proposed agreement with ICM and other materials provided by the company and we are concerned that many terms of the agreement appear to require, permit or encourage ICANN to venture far beyond its core technical functions.[i] Specifically, the proposed agreement appears to give ICANN the right to monitor the fulfilment of ICM?s obligations and policy implementation in areas beyond what might reasonably be considered a technically-focused mandate. Some examples:

· ICANN is given an opportunity to review and negotiate policies[ii] proposed by the Registry Operator or the International Foundation for Online Responsibility (IFFOR), many having nothing to do with ICANN?s technical mandate (e.g., promoting child safety and preventing child pornography[iii])



· ICANN is also called upon to approve/disapprove of ICM?s choice of a monitoring agency[iv]



· ICANN (and the GAC) will be called upon to identify names of ?cultural and/or religious significance?[v] as well as ?names of territories, distinct economies, and other geographic and geopolitical names?[vi] to be reserved from use in the .xxx domain.



If ICANN accepts these and other similar conditions in the proposed agreement, it is moving in a very significant way toward taking on an ongoing policy-making and oversight role governing Internet content. There is little doubt that significant public policy issues arise in taking decisions on new gTLDs. The GAC is now in the process of developing ?Principles and Guidelines on Public Policy Issues Regarding the Implementation of New gTLDs? to provide guidance to ICANN on a range of those issues. The Government of Canada considers it inappropriate for ICANN to take on an ongoing role such as the one outlined in the revised proposed agreement with ICM.



Internet content is subject to generally applicable laws in countries where it is available. There have been various instances where national governments have successfully imposed limits on the domestic distribution over the Internet of content found to be in breach of domestic laws. Such content control is controversial in many states and poses many technical and legal challenges. Canada remains of the view that it is not and should not be ICANN?s mandate to set policy related to content or intended to censor, control or interfere with content on the Internet by way of its contracts with TLD operators.



In its discussion of various Internet related policy issues, the GAC and its members have frequently expressed concern about ICANN assuming policy functions which may infringe upon the policy responsibilities of sovereign states. The regulation of Internet content raises precisely this concern. Engaging ICANN in setting policy and supervisory functions related to content is a slippery slope. Once undertaken, the role will surely grow case by case.



ICANN was not conceived to be the global Internet content regulator. It has had some difficulty establishing legitimacy and full acceptance in carrying out its primary function related to managing the domain name system. ICANN?s becoming engaged in content regulation through its contracts with TLDs risks undermining its legitimacy and purpose at a time when these need to be reinforced and strengthened.



The Government of Canada therefore recommends that ICANN should not take upon itself these inappropriate functions. Instead, ICANN should look to alternative measures more appropriate to ICANN?s technical mandate. For example, ICANN could oblige the TLD to require registered sites to apply and maintain current control rating systems that enable filtering by end users who may wish to do so. Other technical solutions are now becoming available that could be required to provide governments or individuals the means to prevent access to sites deemed to be illegal or offensive. Such approaches would empower governments and individual Internet users to determine appropriate content policy as they see fit, without involving ICANN in determining such policy.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[i] The Government of Canada has not conducted a legal review of the proposed agreement. Comments regarding the proposed agreement are made without prejudice to the intent or effect of the agreement.



The following notes refer to page numbers in the ICANN revised proposed agreement with ICM providing for designation of a .XXX sTLD registry:

[ii] see ?Delegation of Authority,? point 4, page 88.

[iii] see ?Registry Operator?s Commitments,? page 86.

[iv] see ?Engagement and Fostering of Monitoring Agencies,? page 87.

[v] see ?Names with Cultural and/or Religious Significance,? page 73.

[vi] see Geographic and Geopolitical Names,? page 57.
davecummings is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 04:48 AM   #21
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,381
Quote:
Insurance Against ICANN et al Overlooking THis!
loool

would be funny if they overlooked it, but I cant imagine that
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 05:22 AM   #22
Kimo
...
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maryland ICQ:87038677
Posts: 11,544
canadian ehhhh
__________________
...
Kimo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 08:13 AM   #23
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by germ View Post
yeah i dont really see what the canadian government has to do with anything in regards to this issue.
they have

ICANN cares about the governments opinions, they have their GAC -Governmental Advisory Committee and well.... Canada is one of the Governments....

The doubts that GAC expressed last year regarding .xxx were one of the reasons why it was not approved.
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 08:39 AM   #24
Nysus
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,817
"For example, ICANN could oblige the TLD to require registered sites to apply and maintain current control rating systems that enable filtering by end users who may wish to do so."

That's an example of what the GAC suggests they do.. it's what I said and many others have proposed. That is the best way, the only way really.
Nysus is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:01 PM   #25
polish_aristocrat
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 40,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by davecummings View Post
Thanks for alerting us to this--we appreciate you monitoring the ICANN Forum/Comments and giving us the word:-)).

Dave
no problem
__________________
I don't use ICQ anymore.
polish_aristocrat is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:16 PM   #26
DaddyHalbucks
A freakin' legend!
 
DaddyHalbucks's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada USA
Posts: 18,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat View Post
see message here

http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg00558.html


basically they are anti-.xxx since it would require ICANN to play a more direct role in monitoring content and they say ICANN should just concentrate on the technical side of the Web

A very good argument.
__________________
Boner Money
DaddyHalbucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:23 PM   #27
Webby
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Far far away - as possible
Posts: 14,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat View Post
see message here

http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-icm.../msg00558.html


basically they are anti-.xxx since it would require ICANN to play a more direct role in monitoring content and they say ICANN should just concentrate on the technical side of the Web

Gotta rush and not got time to pull up the URL's, but there are a few Euro countries with the same opinions
__________________
XXX TLD's - Another mosquito to swat.
Webby is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:26 PM   #28
Huggles
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 7,415
The internet is still so, so primative
__________________
I make my money from people jerking off
Huggles is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:29 PM   #29
Hazlewood
Confirmed User
 
Hazlewood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,555
Steven Harper Is A Fuck Head And So Who The Whole Conservative Party...he Is On His Hands And Knees With George W.'s Cock In His Mouth
__________________

Skype: hazegsm
Hazlewood is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:34 PM   #30
_Richard_
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
_Richard_'s Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 30,979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hazlewood View Post
Steven Harper Is A Fuck Head And So Who The Whole Conservative Party...he Is On His Hands And Knees With George W.'s Cock In His Mouth
a constructive, clear and legitimate opinion. Thanks!

R
__________________
skype: stxrichard | [email protected]
_Richard_ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:41 PM   #31
spider_x
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 481
"basically they are anti-.xxx since it would require ICANN to play a more direct role in monitoring content and they say ICANN should just concentrate on the technical side of the Web"

Mad props to the Canucks for exhibiting one grain of common sense!
spider_x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:42 PM   #32
spider_x
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 481
Looks like ICANN is being influenced by some underground fuckers just like the UN. Hopefully the corruption can be exposed to the public.
spider_x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:44 PM   #33
spider_x
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 481
There's going to be tons more of retarded crap like this in the US, as politicians scramble to divert attention away from the war in middle east
spider_x is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2007, 04:46 PM   #34
s9ann0
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,873
well done canadians
s9ann0 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 06:04 AM   #35
great
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_E4A View Post
Well, this not fact, but, IMO our government LOVES our porn, we bring in money from other contries and pay tax. They love the tax money.

Why fuck with something that is paying for their holidays
I think that any government loves tax money why don't they? So....in my opinion.....all governments will love porn as long as they will bring them money.
__________________
Hello,london escorts, massage parlour in uk!
great is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 08:37 AM   #36
Massage Parlor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by great View Post
I think that any government loves tax money why don't they? So....in my opinion.....all governments will love porn as long as they will bring them money.
All the governments love porn. They make a lot of money out of it, but mostly they like escorts agencies because they are discrete and they keep a very good silence on it. Porn pays not only their holidays, but their cars and their children and wives' cars. They get a good deal of living out of it.
Massage Parlor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 08:52 AM   #37
Michaelious
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,720
As long as they get money or taxes they won't care lol
__________________
Michaelious is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 12:38 PM   #38
latin gay porn
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michaelious View Post
As long as they get money or taxes they won't care lol
Good point! They are neither priests nor saints. The only religion they have is the money religion!
__________________
I don't porn pay per view
latin gay porn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2007, 01:07 PM   #39
tranza
ICQ: 197-556-237
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: BRASIL !!!
Posts: 57,559
That's good news I guess....
__________________
I'm just a newbie.
tranza is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.